November 04, 2003

The Dover Test

Atrios points to an article at CNN in which Mark Shields hits the nail on the head about Bush's banning of the welcoming ceremony for the bodies of fallen soldiers from the Iraqi war.

WASHINGTON (Creators Syndicate) -- At Harvard on January 19, 2000, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Hugh Shelton provided a valuable standard, both to determine whether the United States ought to send the nation's warriors into combat and to enlist "the support of the American people as well as the Congress" needed to sustain that involvement. In Shelton's judgment, such a grave decision :

"(M)ust be subjected to what I call the 'Dover test.' Is the American public prepared for the sight of our most precious resource coming home in flag-draped caskets into Dover Air Force Base in Delaware -- which is a point entry for our Armed Forces?

This is an issue, I think, that should be raised early on. It should be discussed, and it should be decided by our political leadership before any operation begins."

In the invasion and occupation of Iraq, the Bush administration chose instead to duck Shelton's "Dover test." The scene so familiar to older Americans -- of the military honor guard in white gloves, respectfully accompanying from the aircraft to the waiting loved ones the remains of the fallen warrior in the coffin covered by Old Glory, often with a military band offering an appropriately solemn piece -- was simply banned. George W. Bush's war against Iraq could not flunk the Dover test because there would be no Dover test.

[...] Where is the outrage on the part of the press? Are we lapdogs? The administration in full spin control insists that the reality on the ground in Iraq is much more positive than the press reports. Yet the administration denies reality at home -- the reality of the recent heroism of this nation's fallen sons and daughters.

By official government policy,. there is no band to welcome them home. No honor guard to present the folded flag to their widow and orphan, to make certain the family knows that their loss is also their country's loss, that they do not weep alone. It is a cruel and ugly policy that robs the patriot of the glory and public honor he has earned and deserves.

The time is long past in 2003 to take the Dover test.

Posted by thorswitch at November 4, 2003 12:04 AM | TrackBack


Comments

Skeleton Jack - first off, I'm not just talking about Bush not attending funerals - What I'm talking about is his cancelling the ceremony that has traditionally been held each time a dead soldier has to be returned to his or her family as the casket is brought off the plane. This was done to show to a grieving family that the corps grieved with them - that they weren't alone. It demonstrated to them that their son, daughter, mother, father, husband or wife had earned an extra measure of dignity and respect through their heroism and that their sacrifice is valued by this country. Bush decided to cancel that ceremony.

How is it relevent? It says a lot about just how little he cares about the men and women who are dying in his war. He may give lip service to "honouring" the dead and "grieving" with the families, but cancelling this kind of a final tribute to a fallen soldier just to avoid any more attention beind drawn to the number of bodies that are piling up as a result of his folly clearly demonstrates that he really doesn't give a flying fuck. He got his war, it's not going the way he'd planned and damn whoever gets hurt in the process, he's going to hush it up as much as he can.

By the way, just because someone is a liberal doesn't mean they think Clinton walked on water, or that my anger is purely partisan. If Clinton had acted the way Bush has, I'd have disliked him just as much as I dislike Bush - and if Bush were a Democrat, I'd be just as pissed at what he does as I am now.

Posted by: kriselda jarnsaxa at November 4, 2003 04:15 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?