The Bush White House, irritated by pesky questions from congressional Democrats about how the administration is using taxpayer money, has developed an efficient solution: It will not entertain any more questions from opposition lawmakers.So begins an article in todays Washington Post about how the Bush administration has decided it avoid dealing with queries from Democratic legislators.
A new rule will now require any questions for the House and Senate Appropriations committees to first go through the committee chairmen - who are Republicans. If the chair doesn't think the question is appropriate, it just won't get asked.
This came up after House Democrats tried asking how much it had cost to make and hang the "Mission Accomplished" banner for the President's aircraft carrier landing in May.
The director of the White House Office of Administration, Timothy A. Campen, sent an e-mail titled "congressional questions" to majority and minority staff on the House and Senate Appropriations panels. Expressing "the need to add a bit of structure to the Q&A process," he wrote: "Given the increase in the number and types of requests we are beginning to receive from the House and Senate, and in deference to the various committee chairmen and our desire to better coordinate these requests, I am asking that all requests for information and materials be coordinated through the committee chairmen and be put in writing from the committee."Despite the White House's attempt to portray this as a move designed to increase efficiency, even a congressional representative at the American Enterprise Institute - a neocon think tank - says "This is obviously an excuse to avoid providing information about some of the things the Democrats are asking for."He said this would limit "duplicate requests" and help answer questions "in a timely fashion."
The article doesn't indicate if this new methodology will remain a rule just for the Appropriations committees or if it will be expanded to include other committees as well, but I suspect if this change doesn't create too much of an outrage, the White House may try expanding it to include additional committees where they would find it useful to be able to duck questions from their opponents.
Posted by thorswitch at November 7, 2003 10:35 PM | TrackBack| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
| E-mail: | ![]() |
AKA: | ThorsWitch |
![]() | INTP |
![]() | B7 d++ t+ k++ s+ u- f+ i++ o+ x- e l c- |
![]() |


|
Watch out for the icebergs 1 of 1 pedro said: When you're right, you're right. I... Evidence that Saddam had disarmed is found 1 of 2 pedro said: K, this is about the 3rd time I've ... Quick! Somebody get me a thesaurus! 1 of 4 Jenn said: Hey! Great site you have here. I'm ... Bias and diversity in media sources 1 of 4 Qov said: Such interjections don't translate.... Fitting In 1 of 2 nae said: i also agree!....im young (13) and ... |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| « ? ProChoice Is Not AntiLife # » | ||||||||||
| << | domain-ated | >> | ||||||||||
| << ? domain girls # >> | ||||||||||
| <·· PWA ··> | ||||||||||
| < ? blogs by women # > | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| ‹ # Circle of Shadows ? › | ||||||||||
| <-- ? In MY Opinion # --> | ||||||||||
| « # blogshares ? » | ||||||||||
| « # Scorpio ? » | ||||||||||
| < # Blogrollers ? > | ||||||||||
| < ? six degrees # > | ||||||||||
|
[ <<
?
Verbosity
#
>>
] |
||||||||||
| domain whore | ||||||||||
|
Are you a ![]() ? Domain . Addict # |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
)O(
![]() |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||

| Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
|
Rate me at Eatonweb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| |
|
|
Recommended sites |
Please note: The Salon Blog mailing list and web rings are not managed by Salon Magazine, but are specifically for the owners/authors/editors of Salon Blogs. The Salon name is used with permission.
| < £ Salon Bloggers & > |
| Do you own/edit/write a Salon Blog? Join the Salon Bloggers Webring! |







|
|
|
|
|
|