Atrios makes a great point about the diverted $700 million and why we should all be outraged by it.
After 9/11, we went to war in Afghanistan to punish those responsible as well as to remove support for the al Qaeda network more generally. We didn't put enough troops on the ground either finish the job of rounding up the terrorists or to rebuild and install a stable governmenment. The consequence of this is that Bin Laden and many other al Qaeda members were allowed to escape, and much of Afghanistan has reverted to their Taliban-era existence. We know now that part of the reason was that the Bush administration was diverting resources allocated to that purpose in order to attack a country which posed no threat to us or its neighbors. They stole money allocated to make us safer, and used it to make us less safe.This is yet another situation where if it had been a Democrat in office accused of diverting $700 million from the Afghanistan war to preparations for the Iraq war we'd ALREADY have hearings and investigations underway. That needs to be done, and done now.
Keep in mind that a number of people in the Bush administration had previously worked during the Reagan and Bush the First administrations. Some of them may well have been involved in the Iran-Contra scandal, which involved other forms of illegal diversions. And we shouldn't forget that when the Pentagon wanted extra money for a project they didn't want Congress to know about, they leaned on various military bases to "pad" their budget requests so that the bases could then send that money to the Pentagon for their projects.
In other words, the idea of diverting resources for purposes other than what's intended is not an alien concept to this group. It is quite likely that this is a violation of the letter of the law as laid out in the Constritution, and it is certainly a violation of the spirit of the Constitution. Isn't the President supposed to uphold it, not undermine it?
Posted by thorswitch at April 24, 2004 05:22 AM | TrackBackSorry about that - my "comment spam" filter is a bit hyperactive and sometimes blocks perfectly legitimate messages. I sent an e-mail to the address you left above, but I'll say it here, also: If you would like to send your comments to me via e-mail, I'll see if I can find out what triggered the spam filter, fix it and post your comment for you. My intention is not to censor anyone - unless someone actually IS leaving "comment spam", in which case I WILL delete the message and block the IP of the poster.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
| E-mail: | ![]() |
AKA: | ThorsWitch |
![]() | INTP |
![]() | B7 d++ t+ k++ s+ u- f+ i++ o+ x- e l c- |
![]() |


|
The $700 million 1 of 2 kriselda jarnsaxa said: Sorry about that - my "comment spam... Good point 1 of 2 Carolyn Corbett said: Was anyone else out there shocked a... 'The Fallen' on Nightline 1 of 3 kriselda jarnsaxa said: I seems that perhaps you didn't rea... Some areas won't see Nightline listing of war dead 1 of 1 Brad said: Well, I'm glad I don't work for WCH... Maybe we can find some Scotch tape somewhere.... 1 of 2 Aero said: How has Bush shredded the Constitut... |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| « ? ProChoice Is Not AntiLife # » | ||||||||||
| << | domain-ated | >> | ||||||||||
| << ? domain girls # >> | ||||||||||
| <·· PWA ··> | ||||||||||
| < ? blogs by women # > | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
| ‹ # Circle of Shadows ? › | ||||||||||
| <-- ? In MY Opinion # --> | ||||||||||
| « # blogshares ? » | ||||||||||
| « # Scorpio ? » | ||||||||||
| < # Blogrollers ? > | ||||||||||
| < ? six degrees # > | ||||||||||
|
[ <<
?
Verbosity
#
>>
] |
||||||||||
| domain whore | ||||||||||
|
Are you a ![]() ? Domain . Addict # |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
)O(
![]() |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||

| Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
|
Rate me at Eatonweb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
| |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| |
|
|
Recommended sites |
Please note: The Salon Blog mailing list and web rings are not managed by Salon Magazine, but are specifically for the owners/authors/editors of Salon Blogs. The Salon name is used with permission.
| < £ Salon Bloggers & > |
| Do you own/edit/write a Salon Blog? Join the Salon Bloggers Webring! |







|
|
|
|
|
|
What questionable content?!?