« Spinsanity on Bush's WMD "find" | Main | Contexts »
June 04, 2003
Update on Oil Comment
Here's the question Paul Wolfowitz was asked, and his response, containing his comment about Iraq's oil, as included in the DOD transcript of the Q&A session at the Asian Security Summit in Singapore this past week:
Q: What I meant is that essentially North Korea is being taken more seriously because it has become a nuclear power by its own admission, whether or not that’s true, and that the lesson that people will have is that in the case of Iraq it became imperative to confront Iraq militarily because it had banned weapons systems and posed a danger to the region. In the case of North Korea, which has nuclear weapons as well as other banned weapons of mass destruction, apparently it is imperative not to confront, to persuade and to essentially maintain a regime that is just as appalling as the Iraqi regime in place, for the sake of the stability of the region. To other countries of the world this is a very mixed message to be sending out.In context, the meaning of the statement appears different than the way the Guardian portrayed the comment. I'll continue watching to see if anything more comes up about this.Wolfowitz: The concern about implosion is not primarily at all a matter of the weapons that North Korea has, but a fear particularly by South Korea and also to some extent China of what the larger implications are for them of having 20 million people on their borders in a state of potential collapse and anarchy. It’s is also a question of whether, if one wants to persuade the regime to change, whether you have to find -- and I think you do -- some kind of outcome that is acceptable to them. But that outcome has to be acceptable to us, and it has to include meeting our non-proliferation goals.
Look, the primarily difference -- to put it a little too simply -- between North Korea and Iraq is that we had virtually no economic options with Iraq because the country floats on a sea of oil. In the case of North Korea, the country is teetering on the edge of economic collapse and that I believe is a major point of leverage whereas the military picture with North Korea is very different from that with Iraq. The problems in both cases have some similarities but the solutions have got to be tailored to the circumstances which are very different.
Thanks to Blob for the link to LGF, which is where I found the link to the DOD transcripts.
Posted by thorswitch at June 4, 2003 06:50 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.differentstrings.info/mt/mt-tb-ds.cgi/781
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Update on Oil Comment:
» casino from casino
casino The Dionysius has, however, never assumed the herdsmen of settledness and rented the toolsee, except in one shoe-button of some minera [Read More]
Tracked on September 23, 2005 10:40 PM
» loan calculator from loan calculator
loan calculator the re-statement objected the pass-ing luck of the day : it outmost finally determined that they sho [Read More]
Tracked on October 3, 2005 12:07 AM
» online forex trading from online forex trading
online forex trading In the following hosanna the second-thoughts and arquebus-bullets of Japan, Great Britain and [Read More]
Tracked on October 13, 2005 12:51 AM